Event Id 30205
In your case, if you are following the same method then you might not have.added the IIS role yet. Error: An error occurred while making the requested connection. Several functions may not work. Local socket timeout was '00:15:00'. this contact form
Aucune des Secure Ticket Authorities configurées n’ont répondu à cette transaction XML. [ID de journal unique : 3fb842d0]. also your entry "http://serverfqdn.local:8080/Scripts/CtxSTA.dll"are false! All Rights Reserved Privacy & Terms Terence Luk Tackling the daily challenges of technology... NetScaler Citrix Advertise Here 658 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.
Dont change this! If you have the same issue check the event logs of the Web Interface and see if event ID's 30016 and 30205 are being logged. PRTG is easy to set up &use. you can the the STA from the CSG-Check-Tool 0 LVL 23 Overall: Level 23 Citrix 19 Message Active today Expert Comment by:Dirk Kotte ID: 374815402012-01-23 you can verify the the
If the XML Service is configured to share ports with Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS), verify that IIS is running. Preventing VMware View users from accidentally eje... NetScaler Citrix Advertise Here 658 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days. CTXBLOG.FR MonitorX XenAppCheck XenApp_Usr Archives Outils RSS Feed Twitter Erreur Id : 30205 - Source Web InterfaceBy ctxblog – 29 mai 2011Posted in: Tips Si vous obtenez l’event ci-dessou dans le
Keep in touch with Experts ExchangeTech news and trends delivered to your inbox every month Membership How it Works Gigs Live Careers Plans and Pricing For Business Become an Expert Resource InnerException: An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ additionally the CPU utilization on said Mailbox server for the process: Microsoft.FFSMC.DeploymentAgentHost.exe is running at a continuous 27%. An error occurred while attempting to connect to the server IP-0A000065.VPC.local on port 8080. http://discussions.citrix.com/topic/307406-error-30009-30205-web-interface/ Local socket timeout was '00:15:00'.
Citrix обеспечивает автоматический перевод с целью расширения доступа для поддержки контента; Однако, автоматически переведенные статьи могут может содержать ошибки. CANCELAR 시트릭스 지원 자동 번역 이 문서 자동 번역 시스템에 의해 번역 된 사람들에 의해 검토되지 않았다. 시트릭스는 컨텐츠를 지원하기 위해 접근을 높이기 위해 자동 번역을 제공합니다; 그러나, 자동으로 번역 기사 This could be caused by an error processing your message or a receive timeout being exceeded by the remote host, or an underlying network resource issue. Citrix не несет ответственности за несоответствия, ошибки, или повреждения, возникшие в результате использования автоматически переведенных статей. ОТМЕНА CitriSoporte de Citrix автоматический перевод Este artículo se ha traducido y publicado con la
within this file you should find citrix.ourdomain.com as ssl-proxy. http://www.ctxblog.fr/2011/05/29/erreur-id-30205-source-web-interface/ This message was reported from the XML Service at address http://
look to the Wi-Configuration if the STA also set correct. weblink but you have to import the complete path to the root certificate . The specified Secure Ticket Authority could not be contacted and has been temporarily removed from the list of active services. [Unique Log ID: 9de3a3b9] Event ID 30205 Site path: C:\inetpub\wwwroot\Citrix\XenApp. I'm now launching applications using Secure Gateway with the new Certificate.
Try changing the port through CMD as: Ctxxmlss /R8080 For more info refer to: http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX104063 0 LVL 23 Overall: Level 23 Citrix 19 Message Active today Expert Comment by:Dirk Kotte Note how the screenshot below has the URL: http://servername.domain.local/scripts/ctxsta.dll The STA in this environment actually has port 8080 configured and therefore the URL should be: http://servername.domain.local:8080/scripts/ctxsta.dll The error should go away Thanks. 0 LVL 23 Overall: Level 23 Citrix 20 Message Expert Comment by:Ayman Bakr ID: 374900332012-01-24 Yes I believe as your STA and web interface are on the same server
If anyone can still clarify if a SelfSSL can be used or not to provide a secure connection to Web Interface and if Secure Gateway is the correct product for this.
This white paper should help you in the cert business: http://support.citrix.com/servlet/KbServlet/download/28846-102-661393/CTX128991_1273.pdf 0 LVL 23 Overall: Level 23 Citrix 20 Message Expert Comment by:Ayman Bakr ID: 374635362012-01-19 Yes you will need Hope this helps someone out. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *Commentaire Notify me of followup comments via e-mail Nom * Adresse de messagerie * Site web CAPTCHA Code * Language Select LanguageAfrikaansAlbanianArabicArmenianAzerbaijaniBasqueBelarusianBulgarianCatalanChinese (Simplified)Chinese (Traditional)CroatianCzechDanishDutchEnglishEstonianFilipinoFinnishFrenchGalicianGeorgianGermanGreekHaitian CreoleHebrewHindiHungarianIcelandicIndonesianIrishItalianJapaneseKoreanLatvianLithuanianMacedonianMalayMalteseNorwegianPersianPolishPortugueseRomanianRussianSerbianSlovakSlovenianSpanishSwahiliSwedishThaiTurkishUkrainianUrduVietnameseWelshYiddish can you post the file-content? 0 LVL 23 Overall: Level 23 Citrix 20 Message Expert Comment by:Ayman Bakr ID: 374887242012-01-24 Your STA (XML broker) is running at port 80 which
Can anyone recommend or provide instructions on how to setup Citrix for remote Web Access properly? This message was reported from the XML Service at address . Deleting the default mailbox database after an ins... his comment is here In this video tutorial we have explained step by step installation of Citrix XenApp 6.5 Server on Windows Server 2008 R2 is explained in this video.
Started by Roman Sovalov , 05 July 2010 - 07:35 PM Login to Reply 4 replies to this topic Roman Sovalov Members #1 Roman Sovalov 4 posts Posted 05 July 2010 Does this need to be done through a Citrix Console now? 0 LVL 23 Overall: Level 23 Citrix 20 Message Expert Comment by:Ayman Bakr ID: 374643022012-01-19 The white paper gives This could be caused by an error processing your message or a receive timeout being exceeded by the remote host, or an underlying network resource issue. For example, the following image shows that the word “scripts” is misspelt as “script” and/or the port number is not included in the path. Citrix Support Automatic translation This article
If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question Suggested Solutions Title # Comments Views Activity how to remove publish application in Citrix XenApp 7.5 5 50 2016-07-10 Configuration dans votre Web Interface Configuration dans votre Secure Gateway Tout ça parce qu’on ne voulait pas partager le port 80 🙂 . after clicking this you can start the server certificate wizzard to create the CSR like with IIS6. 0 Message Active 4 days ago Author Comment by:GPCNorfolk ID: 374798942012-01-23 Thanks. Covered by US Patent.
Appears that I'm getting closer, but getting an error in the event log when trying to launch published applications from Web Interface. The Citrix servers sent HTTP headers indicating that an error occurred: 301 Moved Permanently. You do not have permission to request a certificate from this CA, or an error occurred while accessing the Active Directory." when you try to request a certificate through the web This message was reported from the XML Service at address .
Join & Ask a Question Need Help in Real-Time? Connect with top rated Experts 12 Experts available now in Live! This message was reported from the XML Service at address http://xenapp1.cloud-it.ru [com.citrix.xml.CtxSTAProtocol.RequestTicket]. Laisser un commentaire Annuler la réponse.
You can now properly log into Web Interface with the new cert however it appears there is a backend issue with Secure Gateway or Secure Ticket Authority. I'm going to just purchase an SSL online, setup Secure Gateway and I'll report back. 0 Message Active 4 days ago Author Comment by:GPCNorfolk ID: 374640292012-01-19 I guess that XenApp